Ace the Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) Challenge 2025 – Unlock Your Privacy Power!

The reasoning for choosing monitoring activities without consent as the correct answer lies in the fundamental principles of privacy and individual rights. In many jurisdictions, individuals have a right to privacy, which typically includes the expectation that they will not be observed or recorded without their knowledge or permission. When video surveillance occurs without explicit consent, it can lead to significant privacy violations, as people may feel they are being watched and their actions are being scrutinized without their approval.

This concern is heightened in contexts where individuals may not be aware they are being monitored, such as in public spaces or in places where cameras are positioned in such a way that their presence is not obvious. This lack of consent fundamentally undermines the trust between individuals and the entities conducting the surveillance, whether they are businesses, governments, or other organizations.

In contrast, high-quality video recording technology points to the ability to capture clearer images but does not inherently raise privacy concerns by itself. Similarly, clear communication of surveillance intentions and compliance with privacy regulations are means to address privacy issues rather than aspects that inherently raise concerns. Effective communication and adherence to regulations can help mitigate the privacy risks associated with video surveillance.